$760,000 fuel-card fraud tied to impersonated Michigan carrier
Two Georgia men face federal charges after allegedly using a Detroit trucking company's identity to obtain eight Pacific Pride cards and rack up unpaid fuel purchases across 23 states.

Two Georgia men face federal charges after allegedly stealing $760,320.19 in fuel using a legitimate Michigan trucking company's identity. Mario Bailey and Zachary Walker obtained eight Pacific Pride fuel cards through a fraudulent credit application submitted in the name of Voyager Express Inc., a Detroit-based interstate motor carrier that never authorized the request, according to federal prosecutors.
How did the fuel-card fraud scheme work?
The scheme began with an apartment rental in Detroit during July 2025. Zachary Walker allegedly rented the apartment using an altered driver's license bearing his real name and photograph. The indictment does not specify how the license was altered, but the apartment later served as the delivery address for the fuel cards.
On August 13, 2025, Mario Bailey allegedly impersonated the owner of Voyager Express Inc. He submitted a credit application to Coyne Oil & Propane using an unauthorized Gmail address associated with the trucking company's name. Voyager Express neither knew about nor approved the application. The request sought access to commercial fuel credit under the carrier's identity.
Coyne Oil approved the application and issued eight Pacific Pride fuel cards. The company mailed them to Walker's rented Detroit apartment on September 3, 2025. Walker subsequently arranged for Bailey to access the residence. Bailey retrieved the cards on September 13, ten days after their mailing.
The cards generated $760,320.19 in unpaid fuel purchases and accrued interest. Transactions occurred across 23 states between September 2025 and January 2026. Coyne Oil received no payment for the resulting balance.
What charges do Bailey and Walker face?
A federal grand jury indicted Bailey and Walker on September 23, 2026, in Michigan's Eastern District. Both defendants face charges involving unauthorized access devices, wire fraud, and mail fraud. The court unsealed the indictment on October 21.
The access-device charge carries a maximum 10-year prison sentence for a first offense. Wire fraud and mail fraud each carry maximum penalties of 20 years in prison.
The wire fraud charge centers on an electronic credit application transmitted from Atlanta to Mount Pleasant. Prosecutors identify the mailed fuel cards as the basis for the separate mail fraud count. The access-device charge concerns the defendants' purported trafficking of fraudulently obtained cards.
Federal authorities also seek forfeiture of proceeds traceable to the scheme if the defendants receive convictions.
Walker pleaded not guilty during his November 3 appearance before U.S. Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris. The court released him on a $10,000 unsecured bond. U.S. District Judge David M. Lawson scheduled his jury trial for December 29 in Bay City, Michigan. The available court records do not establish Bailey's plea or trial date.
Bailey and Walker remain presumed innocent unless prosecutors prove their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Who purchased the fuel and where did it go?
Prosecutors do not identify who purchased the fuel, which vehicles received it, or whether anyone resold it. Some fuel-card fraud schemes involve selling discounted fuel to truck drivers. However, prosecutors have not established whether Bailey and Walker used that approach. Count One accuses Bailey and Walker of obtaining the cards with the intent to transfer them to others.
What red flags should fuel providers watch for?
Carrier identity impersonation can expose fuel providers to substantial financial losses through fraudulent commercial credit applications. The Voyager Express case follows a pattern seen in other freight fraud schemes: criminals use a legitimate carrier's name and operating authority to obtain credit, then disappear with the goods or services.
A California trucking owner admitted to a $2.1 million identity theft scheme involving fraudulent credit card accounts earlier this year. A separate $12 million cargo theft investigation also involved suspects accused of exploiting legitimate trucking company identities.
Independent verification of ownership and applicant authorization helps businesses identify suspicious requests before extending credit. Red flags in the Voyager Express case include:
- An unauthorized Gmail address associated with the trucking company's name, rather than a company domain.
- A delivery address that does not match the carrier's registered business address.
- No direct phone contact with the carrier's known ownership to confirm the application.
Fuel providers extending commercial credit should verify the applicant's identity through multiple channels. Call the carrier's published phone number, not a number provided on the application. Confirm the request with the registered owner or authorized officer. Check whether the delivery address matches FMCSA records for the carrier's principal place of business.
What carriers should know about fuel-card fraud
If you operate a trucking company, monitor your business identity the same way you monitor your personal credit. Criminals can submit fraudulent credit applications in your company's name without your knowledge. You may not discover the fraud until a creditor pursues collection or law enforcement contacts you.
Check your company's credit report periodically. Review FMCSA records to ensure no unauthorized changes appear in your operating authority. If you receive collection notices for accounts you never opened, file a police report and notify the creditor immediately that your identity was stolen.
Fuel providers and other vendors should implement carrier onboarding procedures that verify the applicant's authority to act on behalf of the carrier. A phone call to the carrier's registered contact, combined with verification of the applicant's email domain and delivery address, can prevent most impersonation schemes before credit is extended.




