Waabi VNL Autonomous Surfaces at ACT Expo With Distinct Sensor Config
Volvo Autonomous Solutions fields two production-ready VNL Autonomous variants: Aurora's public-facing model and Waabi's less-publicized hardware configuration.

What sensor hardware does the Waabi VNL Autonomous use?
Waabi's production-ready VNL Autonomous uses a distinct sensor configuration developed in tandem with Volvo Autonomous Solutions, visible on the unit displayed at the Advanced Clean Transportation Expo in Las Vegas. The sensor array differs from the Aurora-powered VNL Autonomous variant that has dominated trade-show floors and marketing materials.
Volvo Autonomous Solutions operates two parallel autonomous-truck partnerships, one with publicly traded Aurora Innovation, the other with privately funded Waabi. Both developers field production-ready versions of the VNL Autonomous, but Aurora's technology has received the bulk of public exposure. The vast majority of VNL Autonomous appearances, from trade shows to YouTube marketing to the VNL Autonomous webpage, feature Aurora's hardware.
Why Volvo runs two autonomous VNL variants
Waabi's model has received less fanfare despite being production-ready. The truck displayed at ACT Expo shows Waabi's influence most clearly in the sensor configuration and the virtual-driver software stack. The sensor layout is visible on the exterior; the virtual driver is not.
The dual-partnership structure lets Volvo hedge technology risk while both developers refine their systems. Aurora's public-market status and higher media profile have made its VNL variant the default reference point for autonomous Volvo hardware, but Waabi's version represents a parallel path to driverless freight.
What fleets need to know about autonomous VNL serviceability
No public specifications detail the sensor count, LiDAR supplier, or compute-hardware location for the Waabi VNL Autonomous. The truck's sensor configuration is visible in photos from the ACT Expo display, but Waabi and Volvo have not released service documentation, parts-availability timelines, or shop-training requirements for the hardware.
Fleets considering autonomous-truck adoption face a serviceability gap: neither Waabi nor Aurora has published roadside-failure protocols, sensor-replacement costs, or rural-terminal compatibility data. The hardware is production-ready, but the service infrastructure remains undefined.
Autonomous-truck developers have focused on proving driverless capability on pilot routes, not on building the parts network and diagnostic tooling small fleets need to keep the units running outside major metros. Until sensor costs, recalibration procedures, and warranty terms become public, the VNL Autonomous remains a technology demonstration rather than a spec-sheet option.
When autonomous VNL units will scale beyond pilot lanes
Both Waabi and Aurora are targeting driverless operations, removing the safety driver, on specific lanes. Aurora has opened a Dallas–Oklahoma City route with the VNL Autonomous and expects to remove the safety driver within the next operating phase. Kodiak Robotics and Roehl Transport launched an autonomous freight route between Dallas and Houston, also targeting driverless ops.
The VNL Autonomous hardware is production-ready, but commercial scaling depends on sensor cost, service infrastructure, and route complexity. Fleets operating outside the Texas and Oklahoma corridors where autonomous developers are concentrating have no timeline for when the technology will reach their lanes or what the per-truck cost will be once it does.
Trucking media has not yet ridden in either the Waabi or Aurora VNL Autonomous variants. Until ride-along access opens, the operational differences between the two systems remain speculative. The sensor configuration is the only hardware distinction visible from the outside.




